Swiss ep 25- gap 4.2
Short Summary:
The video discusses a gap (4.2) in Swiss entrepreneurial support, specifically the lack of government recognition for incubator programs. The speaker explains a new initiative aiming to address this gap, not by creating a forced label, but by providing a form of recognition that unlocks benefits for participating incubators. This initiative aims to improve startup statistics and incentivize participation, while being realistic and avoiding coercion. No specific technologies or examples beyond the general context of incubator programs and government policy are mentioned. The implication is improved support and growth for Swiss startups. No specific processes or methods are detailed beyond the goal of creating a system of recognition.
Detailed Summary:
The transcript focuses on a single issue: the absence of official government recognition for Swiss incubator programs despite existing policy incentives. The speaker highlights this as a significant problem (gap 4.2).
Section 1: The Problem: The speaker begins by stating the current lack of government recognition for incubators, despite existing policies that incentivize their participation. This creates a disconnect between policy aims and practical implementation. The speaker mentions that many policies incentivize incubators, but there's no official recognition from a government office.
Section 2: The Solution: The speaker introduces a new initiative designed to address this gap. The key is to provide a form of recognition, not a forced label, that offers benefits to participating incubators. This approach aims to be realistic and avoid forcing participation. The goal is to create a system of recognition that allows incubators to access further benefits.
Section 3: The Goal: The initiative aims to improve startup statistics and address the low number of startups. The speaker emphasizes the importance of a realistic approach, avoiding any impression of coercion. The desired outcome is a system of recognition that provides advantages without mandating participation.
Notable Quotes: "very soon decrease on how that we could do something certificate recognition...there a lot of policy at the moment that has incentive for incubator for us however there no recognition who be like recognized by the office from the government," and "we also want to be realistic not to like framing or framing any of you into one about that we just for cing but what we trying to do is to create it's not a label but also a kind of recognation so so that you can enjoy other benefit from the yes." These quotes clearly illustrate the problem and the proposed solution. The language is informal, reflecting a conversational style.